by Rasha El-Ibiary, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne
Televising War: From Vietnam to Iraq. London: Continuum
International Publishing Group. 2004. Paperback. 148 pages.
ISBN: 0826473067 $35.95.
In discussing obstacles
and challenges constraining critical journalism, Andrew Hoskins
essentially traces development in policy and techniques of war
coverage, from Vietnam to the 1991 Gulf War to the latest US-led
invasion of Iraq 2003.
Emphasizing the role of television in constructing collective
memory and shaping audience perception of news, Hoskins argues,
"Television, and particularly television news, produce
a new and apparently reliable stream of historical consciousness
of today's events."
Most significant is Hoskins' account of the different conditions
that shaped media coverage of 2003 Iraq war, pointing to the
role of "immediacy" in constraining accurate and critical
journalism, and which resulted in "breaking rumors"
rather than "breaking news."
Embedded TV correspondents were effective in delivering the
coalition's viewpoint, he writes. The coverage strongly stressed
"intense competition" and raised "audience expectations,"
both "driven by a compulsion for reality television"
by the embedded reporters. The embedding of TV reporters and
the pressure for immediacy, in effect strangled objective reporting.
The "narrow and decontextualized snapshots of the war"
were predominantly caused by the "shrinking of the physical
distance between the embed and soldier" that was "matched
by a shrinking of the critical distance between journalist and
the story." Rather than critically reporting on the war,
news networks and their embedded correspondents constructed
the story, and in many instances became part of the story. "Journalists
themselves became contestants in warfare. And news packaged
as entertainment provided the requisite celebration of participants."
Unlike the single American perspective that prevailed in 1991,
Arab-based satellite channels, however, provided completely
different perspectives of the war, which Hoskins claims were
also market-driven, and lacked objectivity. Channels like Al
Jazeera, Al Arabiya and Abu Dhabi TV featured "journalists
possessed with different histories and different motivations,
and so structured different templates through which to frame
the Iraq war." Objectivity was a mirage. Neither the Arab
nor the Western versions of the war can claim to have presented
independent reporting. Rather, the audience expectations, and
the consequent market forces, made war news more of a commodity,
with audiences "increasingly able to consume a version
of news that does not challenge their (or their nation's) cultural
and political outlook, or, conversely, choose one that does."
Providing an opposite version of the war news to their audience's
expectations, Arab media were able at times to challenge US
"news management." A key issue for western broadcasters
was whether to air footage of captured US POWs, fully shown
on Al Jazeera, from the Iraqi TV. Only CBS showed the footage,
with faces "blurred," while CNN only showed a still
photo from Al Jazeera footage that depicted corpses on the floor.
By making the footage available in "the public domain,"
Al Jazeera apparently provided an excuse, if not an obligation,
for the Western channels to show some of the footage. Also,
the fact that Al Jazeera broadcast the controversial footage
made it "as significant a part of the news story as the
actual capture of the POWs."
In Televising War, Hoskins provides a crucial and critical
analysis of the televisual war coverage in east and west, questioning
their claims to objectivity and truth and posing audience expectations
and market forces as the main driving forces of news coverage.
This, of course, is nothing new. Most books about media and
war have reported the same findings. However, Hoskins makes
a significant contribution to our understanding of how technology
and governmental policies drive TV's war coverage.
[printer friendly version]